<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passion Facade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/</link>
	<description>The manic mind of the minister -- Auntie Mame Meets Cotton Mather</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>I didn't know that detail about the doors - thanks peacebang for translating it. I hadn't expected to like the Subirachs work, but I do; it's honest, intelligent, and moving. I liked it even more after I heard he moved into the church for the duration of the project.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Apparently the figure of Nicodemus, in the burial scene, is Subirachs - his hand has been enlarged and there is an 'S' engraved on him. So though an agnostic, he engages very personally with the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know that detail about the doors - thanks peacebang for translating it. I hadn&#8217;t expected to like the Subirachs work, but I do; it&#8217;s honest, intelligent, and moving. I liked it even more after I heard he moved into the church for the duration of the project.</p>
<p>Apparently the figure of Nicodemus, in the burial scene, is Subirachs - his hand has been enlarged and there is an &#8216;S&#8217; engraved on him. So though an agnostic, he engages very personally with the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeaceBang</title>
		<link>http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>PeaceBang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>I should have posted a photo of the Nativity Facade, which is a wonderful thing (but much dirtier than the Passion side of the temple). I didn't know that Subirachs was an agnostic -- never thought about it -- perhaps that's part of the power of his art? That he is entering into the story from a place of some distance and giving it a kind of visitor's respect. If that makes sense...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think above all that I felt a tremendous sense of respect from Subirachs in how he chose to tell the story. Respect and humanist dignity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have posted a photo of the Nativity Facade, which is a wonderful thing (but much dirtier than the Passion side of the temple). I didn&#8217;t know that Subirachs was an agnostic &#8212; never thought about it &#8212; perhaps that&#8217;s part of the power of his art? That he is entering into the story from a place of some distance and giving it a kind of visitor&#8217;s respect. If that makes sense&#8230;</p>
<p>I think above all that I felt a tremendous sense of respect from Subirachs in how he chose to tell the story. Respect and humanist dignity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaume</title>
		<link>http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peacebang.com/2006/01/30/passion-facade/#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>Although I am not in favor of bashing Subirachs for his façade (it was the favorite sport among the Barcelona cultural elite 15 years ago), I much prefer Gaudí's Nativity, for the reasons that I could explain to you personally and also others. To mention just one, Gaudí was a "true believer" (he knew what he was doing and why --and he was totally crazy, which is not necessarily a plus, but it helps), whereas Subirachs is an honest agnostic, and it shows in their work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I am not in favor of bashing Subirachs for his façade (it was the favorite sport among the Barcelona cultural elite 15 years ago), I much prefer Gaudí&#8217;s Nativity, for the reasons that I could explain to you personally and also others. To mention just one, Gaudí was a &#8220;true believer&#8221; (he knew what he was doing and why &#8211;and he was totally crazy, which is not necessarily a plus, but it helps), whereas Subirachs is an honest agnostic, and it shows in their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
