PeaceBang
The manic mind of the minister -- Auntie Mame Meets Cotton Mather. Blogging about Unitarian Universalism, UU Christian spiritual practice, occasional cultural and political ravings, and the inner life of ministry. PeaceBang is the alter ego of a small town pastor serving an historic New England Unitarian Universalist congregation.
La Vie En Rose: A PeaceBang Review
March 3, 2008 on 7:47 am | In TV/Movies/Theatre/Book Reviews | Now, there’s nothing I love better than a good entertainment bio pic; especially one featuring a super diva like Edith Piaf and the age-old “she came from the streets, lived in a brothel, drank hard, loved hard and had brass lungs to beat the band” variety. But “La Vie En Rose,” except for a marvelous performance by the recently Oscar’d Marion Cotillard, was just not very interesting. Yes, we marvelled at her great characterization of Piaf, we loved the Parisian scenery, we thought her lip-syncing was extraordinarily good, but we were, in the end, unmoved by this story. Why? Because it just seemed an endless, wearying epic of bad luck, more bad luck,sordid characters, a lot of drinking, drugs and hoarse shouting, cliched lines like “I’m gonna be a STAR - THEY can’t keep me DOWN!” and the de rigeur tragic love story.

Maybe it’s a French thing. I was absolutely riveted by “Life With Judy Garland: Me and My Shadows,” the wonderful bio-pic about our own American version of Piaf, Miss Judy Garland, played in the film by Judy Davis. Aside from one really bad fat suit, Davis got into the heart and soul of Garland and made her a force of nature you cared about, whereas with Piaf’s character I just felt she was a rather boring gal who happened to have a really distinctive and strong voice. Yes, we got the whole Svengali scene in “La Vie En Rose” where an abusive mentor breaks Piaf down and gets her to use her arms and her full heart and soul to express l’amour and such, but in the end I felt her a shallow woman, not much there, just a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing but the will to survive. That isn’t to discredit Miss Cotillard’s exquisite work, but perhaps a critique of the screenplay or the direction.
I think I’ll watch “Me and My Shadows” again soon, just to revel in the amazing performances by Tammy Blanchard (who doesn’t impersonate so much as reincarnate the young Judy) and Judy Davis, and to get all the wringing-hankie dramatic pay-off at the end that I had hoped for from “La Vie En Rose” but didn’t get.
3 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^

I love JUDY DAVIS! I think I will finally watch Me and My Shadows! As for Piaf… That is exactly what I have been hearing from everyone who sees the film… GOOD TO KNOW.
Comment by Michael — March 3, 2008 #
Was Edith Piaf actually a boring person with a great set of pipes in real life? I was wondering about that movie as I kept seeing ads for it, but just wasn’t sure …. I’ll probably pass!
Comment by h sofia — March 3, 2008 #
when I saw the previews for La Vie En Rose I really wanted to see it, but now am reconsidering. is it still and entertaining film to watch? the music sounded good from the previews, but good enough to see the film for? …in your humble opinion of course. [I don’t know, Justine. It’s a very impressive performance, but I went away emotional unmoved. I’d sooner re-watch “Funny Girl” or “The Rose” or “Me And My Shadows” or “Ray” or the wonderful HBO movie (available on Netflix) about the life of Marilyn Monroe starring Mira Sorvino and Ashley Judd to see brilliant performances of legendary performers, and wind up in a soft heap of emotion at the end, than sit through “La Vie” even once. - PB]
Comment by Justine Urbikas — March 5, 2008 #