A Love Letter to “Matilda The Musical”

This is long overdue, as I saw “Matilda” on Wednesday, April 17, 2013, right after it opened at the Shubert Theatre on Broadway.

My sister was the one who alerted me to the fact that “Matilda” by Roald Dahl had been made into a musical and who suggested that we go together. I’m the theatre gal in the family and she’s the art gal, so this was a fun role reversal for us. I’m usually the one who has new shows on the radar, but my sister is a fan of Tim Minchin and knew that he had written the score.

Well, Tim Minchin has not just written the score, he has written THE SCORE for me right now. And I want to thank him, and the team of talented people who brought this project to life, because as the drag queens say, it is giving me life.

At the ripe old age of 48, I would have thought myself past the stage of playing an original cast recording over and over until the tape starts to warble and the orchestra sounds like it’s playing underwater. Good thing we’re in an era of new technology, because I have both the London and the new Broadway cast recording (yay!) on frequent rotation. OK, constant rotation.

 

matilda-the-musical_2

“Matilda The Musical” is one of those rare moments in theatre history where original source material, creative team, cast and zeitgeist come together to make something marvelous, magical and deeply moving.

Pardon me, Mr. Minchin, if I get any of your droll lyrics wrong here, as I am quoting from memory.

The show is about children, parents, schools and teachers. It is about families, generational trauma and abuse, and redemption. The most miraculous thing to me about this miraculous show is its ability to shift with total grace and humor between biting mockery of the gospel of every child’s exceptionalism, the stupidity of pop culture (the Kardashians and those who love them should be sent a complimentary copy of Gabriel Ebert and Taylor Trensch moronically celebrating television and the inanities of reality TV in “Telly”) and the comedic aspects of bad parenting (Lesli Margherita, in a kind of blonde Marge Simpson glamour wig, is simultaneously scary and adorable as a brash, neglectful mother without one ounce of maternal instinct) and the depths of the soul.

That may sound a bit much, to claim that “Matilda” addresses the depths of the human soul. It may especially sound so to the composer, Tim Minchin, who is famously and entertainingly atheistic. I hope I won’t offend him by saying that for me, the show’s willingness to spend just as much time on quiet, contemplative moments featuring nothing more spellbinding than a small child telling stories to a rapt librarian (Karen Aldridge as a wonderfully sympathetic Mrs. Phelps) as it does on clever numbers performed by a drill team of preternaturally talented children is what makes it one of the great all-time musicals, and certainly the best I have seen in at least twenty years.

I don’t know how the writers (Minchin and Dennis Kelly, who wrote the book), director (Matthew Warchus, and I’m bowing down to you, sir), brilliant choreographer Peter Darling, design team, and cast managed to channel the complex, slightly macabre, melancholic and outrageous world of Roald Dahl, but they did. They did, and along the way they also managed to achieve something I would never have thought possible, which is to absolutely preserve the integrity of the star character:  a small, bookwormish and sombre little girl who is neither cute, nor winning, nor optimistic. It is impossible not to compare “”Matilda” to another show with a young girl star running right now on Broadway in a successful revival (which I have also seen twice). I love the musical “Annie,” but Matilda is no Annie. Annie is a winning, extroverted little ray of sunshine bringing love to the heart of a big tycoon and to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

The sun’ll come out tomorrow!

Bet your bottom dollar that tomorrow/there’ll be sun!

Matilda is a smart child who is very much aware that her parents can’t stand her, and who  makes no attempt to be cute about reality. She introduces herself with this hilarious sample of Minchin’s talent for comic poignance:

My mummy says I’m a lousy little worm.

My daddy says I’m a bore.

My mummy says I’m a jumped up little germ/that kids like me should be against the law.

My daddy says I should learn to shut my pie hole/no one likes a smart-mouthed girl like me.

Mum says I’m a good case for population control/Dad says I should watch more TV.

You’ll never catch Matilda tap dancing in the finale. I am sure I am not the only one who found her character revelatory: she is a child who is allowed to face reality head on, to stand up for herself, and to bond with an adult who treats her as an intellectual equal. “Matilda” is radical because it allows a little girl to be angry. It shows a little girl as one who calls out truth in a powerful and demanding way rather than in the culturally-approved dimpling manner we have become used to in female characters.

21879-3314-08matilda-12.5-070

As a woman who was once a serious little girl with precocious reading habits, a difficult and painful home life, and many teachers who became cherished mentors, I relate to Matilda. Her wonderful first act number, “Naughty,” is one of the most delightful character songs I have heard in years (another is Miss Trunchbull’s first act tour de force, “The Hammer”).

I loved “Naughty,” and I was impressed that Minchin would have given such a challenging number to his very young leading ladies (I saw the wonderful Bailey Ryon, who shares the role with three other actresses, as Matilda).  Having assumed that “Naughty” was Matilda’s biggest song, I was wholly unprepared for her second act aria, “Quiet,” a shockingly intense dramatic counterpoint to Matilda’s mother’s raucous declaration of the value of empty flamboyance, “Loud.” While “Naughty” calls on Minchin’s Matilda’s to wrap their mouths around several verses of intricate lyrics coordinated with Peter Darling’s delightful ninja moves, “Quiet” is Matilda’s moment alone in the spotlight, concentrating very hard on blocking out the noisy, emotionally violent and abusive adults around her and trying to explain to us what she is experiencing. It is worth quoting the song in its entirety, as it is a remarkable achievement. The first section is a rushed recitative:

Have you ever wondered, well I have.
About how when I say, say red, for example.
There’s no way of knowing if red
Means the same thing in your head
As red means in my head, when someone says red.

And how if we are travelling at, almost the speed of light
And we’re holding a light
That light will still travel away from us
At the full speed of light, which seems right in a way

But I’m trying to say, I’m not sure
But I wonder if inside my head
I’m not just a bit different from some of my friends
These answers that come into my mind unbidden
These stories delivered to me fully written.

And when everyone shouts like they seem to like shouting
The noise in my head is incredibly loud.
And I just wish they’d stop, my Dad and my Mum.
And the telly and stories would stop just for once.

I’m sorry, I’m not quite explaining it right.
the noise becomes anger and the anger is light
And its burning inside me would usually fade.
But it isn’t today.
And the heat and the shouting.
And my heart is pounding.
And my eyes are burning
And suddenly everything, everything is…

Here, Matilda becomes connected to her telekenetic power and brings us into what she is experiencing:

Quiet
Like silence, but not really silent.
Just that still sort of quiet.
Like the sound of a page being turned in a book.
Or a pause in a walk in the woods.

Quiet
Like silence, but not really silent.
Just that nice kind of quiet.
Like the sound when you lie upside down in your bed.
Just the sound of your heart in your head.

And though the people around me.
Their mouths are still moving.
The words they are forming.
Cannot reach me anymore!

And it is quiet.
And I am warm.
Like I’ve sailed.
Into the eye of the storm.
Well, excuse me Tim Minchin, but for all your atheistic protestations, I would nevertheless like to thank you for putting a child’s mystical experience to music. I think you have written one of the most deeply spiritual musical numbers I have ever heard on the musical theatre stage.

I was a child who had mystical experiences, and I know what I’m talking about. Apparently, Tim Minchin, so do you.  You captured it, you gave it music and words and you gave it to me as a gift that I will always cherish (and hopefully perform myself) and love you for.  So there, with your sarcasm and sexy eyeliner and messy hair and huge heart.

Continue reading “A Love Letter to “Matilda The Musical””

Girls, Remember Who You Are And What You’re Good For: The Oscars Take-Away

I’m fast losing my good humor around the Seth MacFarlane Oscar hosting debacle. The conversation is still raging around the internet, with writers contributing pieces like this and commenters responding with brilliant analysis like this,

Yes! We finally have a winner! In the Most Absurd Feigned Outrage Over Something Seth MacFarlane Said category, this article runs away with the top prize!Jesus Harold Christ, Salon. Get a [expletive deleted] hold of yourself. Quit jerking off to invented Oscars controversy and get back to work.

So I’m going to go on record with why I’m still disgusted and why I’m still hurt and upset for actresses who were especially targeted for categorization, objectification and derision.

Americans seem to think that this debate rests of whether or not they personally found Seth MacFarlane to be funny. There are times when personal opinion should not drive our reaction to a cultural event and this is one of them. Those who found MacFarlane’s material funny but refuse to admit that they were entertained at the expense of actresses on the biggest and most important night for professionals in their industry have some waking up to do.

I have seen too many arguments that the Oscars are just a puff piece and that this is just a tempest in a teapot. This is an ignorant assessment. Hollywood films are America’s biggest cultural export and film is a multi-billion dollar industry. An Oscar nomination has huge economic consequences for actors, technicians, writers and studios. There are also secondary and tertiary industries and micro-economies that revolve around this pageant of celebrity and cinema. The economic stakes around this show are high and important to thousands.

The 2013 Oscars telecast was a teaching moment for women in the industry, or should I say, a moment when women in the industry got schooled, which is a different thing.  The Oscars schooled uppity Hollywood women about their place, which is to be hot bodies to ogle. The takeaway, reinforced in joke after joke after joke was, “Girls, remember what you are, and what you’re good for.”

One of the first skits of the night set the theme. One of the most well-respected women in the industry, Sally Field, winds up in a clinch with a frat boy sitcom writer. Play along, Sally. This smarmy twit should be paying you your propers, but we thought it would be much funnier if he stuck his tongue down your throat. You know, just to remind everyone that that’s what you girls really want.

So gross.

Next up, let’s welcome nine year-old first-time nominee Quvenhané Wallis by calling her out as a future lust interest for an old white man. Do I really have to get all women’s studies here and point out the history of old white men owning young women of color that this joke harkens to? You have to be numb to historical resonances not to feel the sting of that joke in your gut. Wake up, people. The Onion’s ghastly tweet about her has sparked outrage and prompted apologists to justify it. Scott Mendelson is so confused he conflates fashion critique with misogyny. Dude. Fashion is an art form. So is film. Art and criticism go together like peanut butter and jelly. Putting your comedy all over the body of a 9-year old girl is not a related issue.

The infamous “We Saw Your Boobs” number was not made any less sexist by sticking the Gay Men’s Chorus behind it. If anything, the men’s choir just reinforced male solidarity against female power. My first reaction to the song was that it just wasn’t funny. It fell flat. The joke went on way too long.  Then I noticed that ABC had pre-recorded actresses Charlize Theron and Naomi Watts’ reaction shots. They were wearing different gowns, so the fakery wasn’t hard to detect. I began to think about the ways the women in the Academy were being asked to be “good sports” and play along with their own humiliation. Then I got really angry.

The fact that the nudity in the films represented by these actresses was related to sexual abuse, torture and terrorization of female bodies did not matter to MacFarlane and his writers, for whom naked breasts are apparently always about arousing hetero male sexual desire. The whole number was a leering mockery of the actresses who had bared their breasts in order to bring powerful, memorable characters to life. The stories they were telling didn’t matter, the song said.  What mattered was that … heh, heh, we got to see yer boobs!! Jodie Foster, Charlize Theron, and Halle Berry all have Best Actres Academy Awards for roles that required them to take off their shirts. It is simply unconscionable for the Academy to recognize their contribution as artists and then humiliate them for the same body of work (pun intended) years later. I will not forgive this.

I have not heard one defense of this show that didn’t come down to “I thought it was great, so there must be something wrong with you” or “Guess you just don’t have a sense of humor, honey” or “What did you expect from Seth MacFarlane?” (I didn’t expect anything from him: I didn’t know who he was before the telecast and I consider him a spokesman for the movie industry’s sexist, misogynist attitudes. As such, he did his job impeccably well). Personal opinion is not a defense. Attacking someone’s humor is not an adequate defense. One woman wrote to me to say that she’s a rape survivor and SHE thought it was funny, so I should basically shut up. I am sorry that happened to her but there’s no connection. This is about humiliating actresses for doing their job. Unless you’re an actress who has bared her breasts for a serious film role, having been subjected to sexual violence isn’t a free pass to excuse this night of b****-slapping of women in the industry. Saying that a writer’s known reputation for offensive sexism should make the Oscars script acceptable is not a defense. There was a systematic and hostile attempt made the other night to belittle, degrade, correct and dominate a group of highly accomplished, impressive American artists based on their gender on the most important professional night of the year in their industry.  Whether it made you laugh or not does is not the point. The point is that this is intolerable hostility toward women.

A Word From Ermengarde of Feline Talent Agency: “Dear Mr. Ang Lee”

February 25, 2013

Mr. Ang Lee                                                                                                                Anonymous Content Talent Agency                                                                             3532 Hayden Avenue                                                                                                 Culver City, CA 90232

Ermengarde, Director                                                                       Feline Talent Agency

Feline Talent Representing Feline Talent


Dear Mr. Lee,

My name is Ermgengarde Otis Weinstein, no relation to the Weinstein brothers of Miramax, although I do have a brother named Max. He is a beagle. As a talent agent representing feline talent in the entertainment industry, I would like to congratulate you on your Best Director Academy Award™ for “The Life of Pi,” a film that prominently features a feline actor.

We want to reach out to mainstream filmmakers to encourage you to cast feline talent in future projects and to raise awareness of feline artistry and our many contributions to the industry. My clients (which include Terry, who was credited only by the generic “Cat” in Ben Lewin’s celebrated 2012 film, “The Sessions” and Tardar Sauce, currently enjoying great fame as “Grumpy Cat”) work hard to achieve recognition in an industry that often discriminates against feline talent, labeling us demanding and temperamental. Although we recognize that the role of Richard Parker in “The Life of Pi” was largely generated by CGI, we know that there was a real feline artist behind those computerized images and we commend you for helping him to so powerfully convey the true essence of feline nature. The deep indifference communicated by Richard Parker’s hindquarters sauntering into the jungle at the end of the film will go down in history as one of the feline acting community’s proudest and most powerful moments. You helped us get there.

Thank you, Mr. Lee. We wish you great things in your future. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to discuss future projects.

Sincerely yours,

Ermengarde, Feline Talent Agency                                                                                        Feline Talent Representing Feline Talent www.facebook.com/ermengarde